I stumbled upon this while reading some early Church documents. I found it quite fascinating to read an account from a Christian of the 2nd Century on what Christians of the time were like.

The Epistle of Mathetes to Diognetus.

Chapter V.—The manners of the Christians.

For the Christians are distinguished from other men neither by country, nor language, nor the customs which they observe. For they neither inhabit cities of their own, nor employ a peculiar form of speech, nor lead a life which is marked out by any singularity. The course of conduct which they follow has not been devised by any speculation or deliberation of inquisitive men; nor do they, like some, proclaim themselves the advocates of any merely human doctrines. But, inhabiting Greek as well as barbarian cities, according as the lot of each of them has determined, and following the customs of the natives in respect to clothing, food, and the rest of their ordinary conduct, they display to us their wonderful and confessedly striking (Literally, “paradoxical.”) method of life. They dwell in their own countries, but simply as sojourners. As citizens, they share in all things with others, and yet endure all things as if foreigners. Every foreign land is to them as their native country, and every land of their birth as a land of strangers. They marry, as do all [others]; they beget children; but they do not destroy their offspring. (Literally, “cast away fœtuses.”) They have a common table, but not a common bed. They are in the flesh, but they do not live after the flesh. (Comp. 2 Cor. x. 3.) They pass their days on earth, but they are citizens of heaven. (Comp. Phil. iii. 20.) They obey the prescribed laws, and at the same time surpass the laws by their lives. They love all men, and are persecuted by all. They are unknown and condemned; they are put to death, and restored to life. (Comp. 2 Cor. vi. 9.) They are poor, yet make many rich; (Comp. 2 Cor. vi. 10.) they are in lack of all things, and yet abound in all; they are dishonoured, and yet in their very dishonour are glorified. They are evil spoken of, and yet are justified; they are reviled, and bless; (Comp. 2 Cor. iv. 12.) they are insulted, and repay the insult with honour; they do good, yet are punished as evil-doers. When punished, they rejoice as if quickened into life; they are assailed by the Jews as foreigners, and are persecuted by the Greeks; yet those who hate them are unable to assign any reason for their hatred.

Chapter VI.—The relation of Christians to the world.

To sum up all in one word— what the soul is in the body, that are Christians in the world. The soul is dispersed through all the members of the body, and Christians are scattered through all the cities of the world. The soul dwells in the body, yet is not of the body; and Christians dwell in the world, yet are not of the world. (John xvii. 11, 14, 16.) The invisible soul is guarded by the visible body, and Christians are known indeed to be in the world, but their godliness remains invisible. The flesh hates the soul, and wars against it, (Comp. 1 Pet. ii. 11.) though itself suffering no injury, because it is prevented from enjoying pleasures; the world also hates the Christians, though in nowise injured, because they abjure pleasures. The soul loves the flesh that hates it, and [loves also] the members; Christians likewise love those that hate them. The soul is imprisoned in the body, yet preserves (Literally, “keeps together.”) that very body; and Christians are confined in the world as in a prison, and yet they are the preservers (Literally, “keeps together.”) of the world. The immortal soul dwells in a mortal tabernacle; and Christians dwell as sojourners in corruptible [bodies], looking for an incorruptible dwelling (Literally, “incorruption.”) in the heavens. The soul, when but ill-provided with food and drink, becomes better; in like manner, the Christians, though subjected day by day to punishment, increase the more in number. (Or, “though punished, increase in number daily.”) God has assigned them this illustrious position, which it were unlawful for them to forsake.

–  From The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus, Philip Schaff (available online at http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.iii.ii.v.htm).

As an end note, I’m of the personal opinion that every Christian should acquaint themselves with the writings of the early Church — though any such study should be done with extreme caution. Remember, early Church writings give us a good historical background for the Scriptures, but they do not in any way equal God’s word. In fact, some very notable early Church leaders ultimately began to espouse heresy — Tertullian, for example, who became a believer in Montanism. That said, lets hear your thoughts!

4 Responses to “2nd Century Christians”

  1. David Ketter Says:

    Aye, the church fathers have much to say and to inform us in how we should perceive the Scriptures and, indeed, they have insights and examples and instructions that would prove very helpful to us today.

    As for Mathetes, I have long had my conclusions about him: http://davidketter.wordpress.com/2006/08/12/heirs-of-the-church-mathetes/

    If you want a picture of the practice of the earliest generations of Christians, I would commend to you the Didache, which is also contained by Schaff’s volumes (if in difference from its actual text).

  2. Sarah Modene Says:

    I strongly agree: Christians certainly need to become familiar with the examples of those within the early Church. Our spiritual lives are so pathetic in comparison with their own. I noticed that the reason for this difference seemed to be stated clearly.

    Regarding heresy… it’s interesting to note that the temptation to stray from the Gospel was just as strong then as it is now. The problems we face typically are the same, even if they take on different forms. Hmm…

  3. matthammer Says:

    David,

    Thanks for your comment. Just who “Mathetes” is, and where he stood theologically, is something we may never fully know — so I’m personally reserving judgment in calling him a heretic, though I confess some of the language he uses is suspect. (As was brought up in our conversation earlier, his views on the OT are worrisome, along with the way he handles the body/soul issue.)

    My reason for posting this was out of historical/analytical intrigue, and definitely not for the theology contained in Mathetes’s writing (which, again, is suspect). I think it’s fairly safe to assume that the historical observations are largely accurate, considering the recipient(s) of the letter could observe those things for himself(themselves) if he(they) wished. Though even then, if your goal is to learn what 2nd Century Christians were like, then you definitely should dig deeper than one letter of unknown authorship.

    But to anyone who might read this: The theology in this particular passage is probably best if not used to gain a greater understanding of God’s truth — if you desire to gain a deeper understanding of the body/soul relationship, or of the relationship of Judaism/OT to our faith, then you should read your Bible. ;)

    Thanks again!


Leave a Reply